Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 09:08

What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Asteroid 2024 YR4 Could Strike the Moon: NASA’s Webb Telescope Warns - The Daily Galaxy
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
USMNT, messy and meek, unravels quickly for its fourth straight defeat - The Washington Post
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Post-Dobbs abortions continue to increase: Report - Axios
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
See ‘Star Trek: Strange New Worlds’ Season 3 Episode Titles And New Posters - TrekMovie.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
India Is Breaking Apart — Geologists Detect Deep Continental Fracture - The Daily Galaxy
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Nicole Scherzinger and Sarah Snook win top prizes at Tony Awards - BBC